Google’s Nexus Q takes on Microsoft, Apple in the living room

WRITTEN BY ZDNET
Google’s Nexus Q is expensive and odd-looking, and it doesn’t play well with devices outside of the Android world. It’s a pretty weak competitor to Microsoft’s Xbox 360, Apple TV, or even Sonos. Here’s what’s wrong.

Google’s Nexus Q takes on Microsoft, Apple in the living room

It’s also pricey, at $299 without speakers or cables, and it works only with Android devices.



Put those pieces together and you have to wonder whether Google is deliberately trying to limit the market for this product to diehard Google loyalists.


In the industrial design of its new media player, Google has broken out of the box, quite literally. The Nexus Q is a black orb, 4.6 inches in diameter, with a ring of 32 LEDs that “shift and change color in time to your music,” Google says. I guess that makes it a 21st Century lava lamp.


It also has its own 12.5 watt/channel amplifier and ports to connect to a living-room audio system or an HDTV. (If you want even more details, read the full specs.)

Google’s Nexus Q takes on Microsoft, Apple in the living room

The odd thing about the Nexus Q is that it doesn’t include a remote control. Instead, you must control it with an Android phone or an Android tablet using the Google Play and YouTube apps for Android. Nothing else will work.

The new $199/$249 Nexus 7 tablets will fill that role quite nicely, but when you add in that cost you’re up to at least $500. Add in Google’s $300 Triad Bookshelf speakers and $49 speaker cables with banana plugs, plus sales tax, and your total is over a grand.


But hey, you can watch YouTube videos and stream your music collection on that setup.


These design and pricing decisions are very odd indeed.


Microsoft’s Xbox 360 already owns the living room, having sold roughly 70 million units. It has announced and demonstrated its Xbox SmartGlass controller app, which will “work with Windows 8 PCs and tablets, and iPads, iPhones, and Android devices.” At Amazon, the Xbox 360 with Kinect costs 5 bucks less than that odd-looking little Google orb.

Google’s Nexus Q takes on Microsoft, Apple in the living room

Apple TV might still be a “hobby” in Cupertino, but at $99 it’s actually a great deal if you’re an Apple loyalist. You can use any iOS device, including iPhones and iPads, to push content to an Apple TV via AirPlay. Or you can buy music and stream TV shows directly from iTunes. It doesn’t have its own amplifier, like the Nexus Q, but if you already have a decent audio system it’s an easy addition. And you just know that someday, probably soon, Apple is going to deliver a big, big upgrade to Apple TV that will make Google’s offering instantly obsolete.

The Xbox 360 and Apple TV also have other advantages that the Nexus Q can’t match. You can run both boxes using a remote control or an app. They have access to impressively large ecosystems of content and apps (and games, in the case of the Xbox 360). With years of experience, Microsoft and Apple have mastered the supply-chain and manufacturing issues, unlike Google, which is a newcomer to the large-scale hardware business.


Google TV, of course, is the logical competitor to both Microsoft and Apple here, but it appears to have been left behind in favor of the newer, hotter Nexus Q.


In fact, the Nexus Q in its current incarnation looks like more of an answer to Sonos, which offers wireless audio systems that you can control with iPads and iPhones and Android devices and via apps on a PC or a Mac. The Sonos 3, which is the same price as the Nexus Q, includes a more-than-adequate speaker and appeals to all sorts of people who don’t want to be locked into an all-Android environment.

Google’s Nexus Q takes on Microsoft, Apple in the living room



There’s no question that Google has created a pretty device in the Nexus Q. The fact that it’s made in the USA is admirable and justifies at least part of the premium price. But it’s hard to imagine that anyone but Android diehards will find it worth buying.

Google Drive – Apple’s iCloud Alternative ( videos )

Google has finally released Drive, a new cloud storage option for all Google account holders, offering up to 5 GB worth of free storage. While it may be easy to draw comparisons to Dropbox, Microsoft’s SkyDrive, or Amazon Cloud, Google Drive represents the final element of a powerful cloud platform, with services that rival those of Apple’s iCloud.



Last year Apple announced its iCloud platform, giving users the ability to sync music, photos, and any other files they might have across all their iOS devices. The announcement was met with varying levels of fanfare. To those unfamiliar with the concept of cloud computing, it seemed like a powerful new tool. To anyone that had used remote storage before, iCloud was underwhelming, as the technology had been around for years.


However, this is Apple we’re talking about, which has a tendency to make a phenomenon out of just about anything it releases. So, despite numerous teething problems, Apple reported that more than 20 million had signed up to iCloud in the first five days of the release of iOS5.


Enter Google


Google had been building up its own selection of cloud services for years – Gmail has always offered free storage space to its users, as do services like Google Docs. Having said that, it was with Android that Google truly pushed into Apple territory, giving users the ability to remotely sync music, photos, and contacts with their portable devices. With Drive, Google completes the platform, allowing generic file storage synced across PC and Android devices.



Google has a bit of a modesty issue, having never triumphantly paraded its cloud services to the world, for with Android, cloud services have always been there. This is likely why Google felt it necessary to release a video reminding Android fans that Google’s been all cloud for a long time.


Directly comparing iCloud to Google services results in near identical specs. Both offer 5 GB worth of generic storage, both have the ability to sync movies, photos, and music, and both cost nothing to the user. But while iCloud users are required to use iTunes for music and photo syncing, Google Music allows its users to simply select folders on their local hard drive, and any new music is uploaded and synced.


Google Drive also makes it easy to publicly share files and collaborate with other users in real time. And these files can be much larger than iCloud allows – a maximum filesize of 10 GB for Drive compared to just 25 MB for free iCloud accounts, increasing to 250 MB for paid accounts.


Ultimately, the great divider between these two services lies in mobile platform of choice, as it is extremely unlikely that Apple will ever release official iCloud applications for Android devices. However, Google already offers numerous apps for iOS devices with Google Drive apps “coming soon” for iPhone and iPad.


Apple’s closed ecosystem that allows it to seamlessly integrate iCloud into iOS (and Mountain Lion) means that the majority of Apple users will probably stick with the “default” option, but Google Drive’s wider compatibility and the ability to get a total of 10 GB of free cloud storage by signing up for both could help attract some to Google’s offering. For users of existing Google services and Android devices, however, with integration in the “Google bar” found at the top of Gmail and other Google services, Drive seems seems like a winner.



Source:GOOGLE DRIVE

Google Drive offers 5 GB of free cloud storage that can be accessed anywhere on the web

google drive download
gdrive
google drive space
gmail drive
google drive by maps
google drive gdrive
google drive 3d
google drive 2012

Mac motorcycle inc

Just by reading the title, it sounds a bit twisted as we have been familiar with the word ‘Mac’.. is Apple next biggest project after the successful of iPhone would be something to do with motorcycle??
ruby_blue_by_macmotorcycles.jpg
The answer to that is NO!
Mac Motorcycles is not a future project from Apple but it is the real motorcycle called Mac Motorcycles. Its a collaboration between one of the UK’s leading motorcycle design studios,Xenophya Design and the founder, Ellis Pitt.
peashooter_black_by_macmotorcycles.jpg
This small range lightweight Mac motorcycles which powered by the Buell® single cylinder, air-cooled, 2-valve, push rod, 492cc with 5-speed ‘Blast’ engine.
peashooter_silver_by_macmotorcycles.jpg
What makes this bike so unique most probably because of its simplicity design and it comes only with 4 models (Spud, Pear Shooter, Ruby, Roarer)
spud_red_by_macmotorcycles.jpg
Even though motorcycles is not really my kind of obsession compare to super cars, I don’t mind to have one of these in my garage..
Learn more about this unique motorcycle design at Mac Motorcycles.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Apple CEO Steve Jobs riding a 1966 R60/2 beemer


Maybe not breaking news nor any interesting spy photos, but seeing Apple’s CEO Steve Jobs riding a beemer has put a grin on our faces. BMW motorcycles stand for German ingenuity, engineering, long distance comfort, durability, understated but elegant designs.
While not as popular in the U.S. as brands like Harley Davidson, BMW Motorrad’s third largest market are represented by American consumers, with 9,168 BMW motorcycles registered in 2009.
Courtesy of Jalopnik, the photo below shows Apple’s then-and-current CEO, Steve Jobs, riding a 1966 BMW R60/2 motorcycle two years before even the original Macintosh was introduced. The picture was featured in the National Geographic Magazine

Apple CEO Steve Jobs
Apple CEO Steve Jobs


The R60 and R60/2 are 600 cc boxer twin BMW motorcycles that were manufactured from 1956 to 1969 in Munich, Germany. Some 20,133 of these 600 cc shaft-drive, opposed twin R60 (1956-1960, 28 hp), R60/2 (1960-1969, 30 hp), and R60US (1968-1969, 30 hp) were built. These models, except for those with the “US” designation, were designed primarily as rugged motorcycles to pull sidecars (mounting points were built in) and had duplex tubular steel frames.

The standard colors for these motorcycles was black with white pin striping, though special colors could be ordered. Indeed, the motorcycles could be ordered in any color that was being used at the time for BMW cars. A special case was Dover white. Michael Bondy, of the U.S.A. BMW importer Butler & Smith, sent BMW a can of that color paint, which was used on his 1942 Packard, and BMW duplicated it. He then ordered 50 motorcycles in that color.
Original prices for an R60/2


U.S. Price: $1,131 (1960) (2008 US$ 8217 after inflation) 
U.S. Price: $1,236 (1965) (2008 US$ 8428) 
U.S. Price: $1,364 (1969) (2008 US$ 8005) 


Engine
* Internal designation 267 / 5
* Type four-stroke, two-cylinder, air-cooled boxer
* Bore/stroke 72 x 73 mm


Cubic capacity 594 cc (34 in.3) 
Maximum power 30 HP at 5800 RPM 
Compression ratio 7.5 : 1 
Valves per cylinder 2 
Carburation system 2 Bing 1/24/125-126 od. 1/24/133-134 od. 1/24/151-152 
Engine lubrication forced-feed lubrication 
Oil pump gear pump 


Dimensions and Weights


Length x width x height 84 x 26 x 39 inches (2125 x 660 x 980 mm) 
Wheel base 55.7 inch (1415 mm; with sidecar 1450 mm) 
Tank capacity 4.5 US gallon (17 l) / optional 6.5 US gallon (24.6 l) 
Unladen weight, full tank 430 lb (195 kg; with orig. BMW sidecar 320 kg) 
Load rating 360 kg (with orig. BMW sidecaR600 kg) 


Performance


Idle/riding noise 81/82 DIN-phon (from June 1967: 74 / 95 dB (A)) 
Fuel consumption 47.0 MPG (ca. 5.0 l / 100 km) 
Oil consumption ca. 0.5 – 1 l / 1000 km 
Top speed 90 mph (145 km/h)