1917 Indian Model O



Talk about a coincidence.


What are the odds that two motorcycle manufacturers, locked in competition for domination of the U.S. market, would come out with the 
same radically
 different design at nearly the same time?

That’s exactly what happened to Indian and Harley-Davidson more than 80 years ago. And the fact that the motorcycles in question were abysmal sales failures only adds to the mystery.
The blind alley into which both companies sped full-throttle? The market for low-horsepower, horizontally opposed twin-cylinder motorcycles.
Indian that charged into the fray first, when it introduced the Model O Light Twin in 1917. In a bold move away from the singles and V-twins that had powered the first 16 years of the company’s success, Indian brought out a 15.7-cubic-inch (265cc) horizontally opposed twin-cylinder motor mounted in a lightweight frame.
This is the engine design that would become famous in generations of BMW motorcycles, continuing to this day. But the design can trace its roots back to British-made Douglas motorcycles, which had been in production since 1907.
Like the early Douglases, the Model O had its engine placed in the frame with the cylinders facing fore and aft, rather than sticking out to each side, the way BMW would eventually do it. It made for a motorcycle that was narrow, lightweight, smooth and practical—all characteristics that Indian hoped would attract a new crop of younger customers.
As it turned out, the Model O was exactly what motorcyclists didn’t want. Its small motor didn’t excite enthusiasts, and the dropping prices of mass-produced cars effectively destroyed the market for motorcycles as cheap transportation.
To add insult to injury, the Model O quickly became known as the “Model Nothing.’’
Sales weren’t great to start with, and they weren’t helped when America got involved in World War I in 1917. Military production meant fewer civilian models for the duration of the war, and the Model O was dropped after 1919.
You’d think that after watching the Light Twin fail, Harley would have learned from Indian’s mistake. But just as the O disappeared, Harley’s Sport Twin—with a motor that looks startlingly similar—debuted in 1919. It, too, never really caught on and was dropped by 1923.







Via : Motorcycle Museum

Enhanced by Zemanta

world war 1 & 2 – Rare Motorcycles


L-300 L-300 – the first serial Soviet motorcycle. Prototype – German Lux-300.
Was used in the Soviet Army in recon and signals units. 
PMZ_A_750 Heavy motorcycle PMZ-A-750 was produced in 1934-38. Those vehicles were used in the Soviet Army 
IZh_9 IZh-9 was produced since May 1940 until Nov. 1941 and used in RKKA 
TIZ-AM-600 TIZ-AM-600.
(prototype – British BSA-600)
Was produced in 1936-1943. Was used in RKKA 
L-600 L-600 fire motorcycle was composed from L-300 motorcycle chassis and Village Motor Pump MP-2
(MP-2: 60x625x665mm, 140 kg weight).
Was produced in years 1934-1939. Was used in fire-brigades during WWII. L-600 also was used as a base for other vehicles. For example lighting variant carried six PES-35 searchlights having 500W lamps. Also was known to be used as a mobile welding machine for electricians. 
ML-3 ML-3 light motorcycle (1939-1941) [6]
L-8 and IZh-12 Upper veiws: L-8 motorcycle.


Lower view: IZh-12 motorcycle (Izhevsk modification of L-8. 49 vehicles built) [7]
Others
Restored motorcycle. Initially this was positioned as M-72. Now I was reported it is K-750 [8]
A column of M-72 motorcycles moving to the fronline, Leningrad Front, Autumn 1941 [9]
Rem. AMVAS – this was an original caption. I was told most likely it’s one of IZh models, or some foreign analog
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Chell Motor Company Ltd.

Of Moorfield Road, produced a number of prototype motorcycles in 1939. In April, details of the ‘Chell Lightweight’ appeared in the ‘Motor Cycle and Cycle Trader’ magazine. The machine, which sold for £25.10s., had a loop frame and was fitted with a 125c.c., or a 98c.c., two stroke Villiers engine, and had twin exhaust pipes, which terminated in tubular silencers.
The ‘Chell Lightweight’. Photo courtesy of Jim Boulton.



Photo courtesy of Jim Boulton
There were pressed-steel front forks and a two gallon petrol tank. The machine had an 18watt electric light and was complete with air cleaner on the carburettor, a horn, number plates, central stand, licence holder, tyre inflator, a toolbox complete with tools, and Dunlop tyres. A Smith’s lightweight speedometer could be fitted to the machine for an extra 35 shillings.
All of the models were powered by Villiers 2 stroke engines, but as World War 2 also started in 1939, the machines were never produced commercially.


Enhanced by Zemanta

ELF Racing – ELF Motorcycle Chassis Designs – Retrospective

The waving of the checkered flag at the Brazilian Grand Prix on September 17, 1988, marked the end of an era. A decade of exciting experimentation came to a close that day when the last ELF racing motorcycle completed its final race. In the 10 years leading up to that day, the ELF name had transcended its petroleum-industry roots. It had become synonymous with a series of ambitious, high-profile and determined attempts to expand the frontiers of motorcycle chassis design. ELF created an alternative motorcycle that would demonstrate its superiority on the most demanding proving ground-international roadracing competition.

ELF wasn’t the first to experiment with alternative motorcycle chassis designs, but it was the best publicized and, thanks to the French petroleum company’s vast resources, the best funded, too. Even if its two-wheeled experiments didn’t radically alter motorcycling’s future, ELF made chassis experimentation respectable. Inspired by ELF, countless designers the world over were encouraged to create the motorcycle of the future. ELF may not have been the first to dream up some of the ideas it subsequently claimed credit for (and patented to recoup some development costs by selling them to Honda), but it legitimized the effort. The actual design solutions ELF evolved over the years were overshadowed by its influence over motorcycle design. Thanks to its involvement in world championship roadracing, the alternative motorcycle design is more of a reality and less of a dream.

ELF has a long history of supporting new motorsports technology, and leveraging that support to build its brand. ELF sponsored Renault in the 1970s, when the French automotive giant introduced turbocharging technology to endurance racing and then to F1. Andre de Cortanze, one of the leading Renault designers during that period, came up with the A442 Alpine-Renault V6 turbo that won the Le Mans 24 Hours, and also developed Renault’s first turbo GP racecar. An enthusiastic enduro rider on two wheels, he was also full of avant-garde ideas on motorcycle design, many of which incorporated lessons learned from the racing car world. Sharing these in conversation with ELF’s marketing boss Francois Guiter during breaks in testing Renault, de Cortanze was eventually entrusted with a small budget for a motorcycle prototype to test his ideas. Thus the ELF motorcycle project was born.


The subsequent Yamaha TZ750-powered ELF X (for experimental) appeared in unfinished form at the 1978 Paris Show. The machine incorporated many of de Cortanze’s principal design aims, which he summarized thusly: “I wanted to get rid of every preconceived notion I had of what a motorcycle should consist of and look like,” he explained. “I wanted to achieve four aims: lower the center of gravity, incorporate ‘natural’ antidive suspension, reduce weight and eliminate the chassis completely as a separate entity. There were secondary objectives: to achieve an ideal 50/50 weight distribution, lower the frontal aspect to reduce the drag coefficient (Cx) and be able to change wheels quickly. I also hoped to improve airflow to the radiator for more effective cooling, and make the suspension and steering geometry adjustable quickly and easily in a way that we had begun to accept as normal on racing cars but which was largely unavailable then on bikes.” De Cortanze was nothing if not ambitious.

The ELF X, built in de Cortanze’s spare time at Renault with its passive blessing, established many of the design features that would become his signatures in future years. Parallel arms replaced a conventional front fork, and a single-sided swingarm held the rear wheel. The chassis was essentially deleted. The arms were mounted to plates bolted to the stressed-member engine. The fuel tank was located beneath the engine, and wind-tunnel-designed bodywork maximized aerodynamic efficiency. The ELF X was a fundamentally radical racing machine.

Michel Rougerie undertook initial track testing in 1978, prior to its racing debut at Nogaro later that year. But development was slow, hampered by problems with a Yamaha two-stroke that proved unsuitable for use as a fully stressed member, and de Cortanze’s part-time involvement. But ELF X made a sufficient impression for none other than Honda to express interest. A private 1979 test session with a Honda test rider confirmed that interest. Soon a collaboration was launched between the Japanese manufacturer and the French fuel giant. Honda agreed to supply ELF with works 1000cc RSC endurance engines for the 1980 season, around which de Cortanze would build an all-new bike incorporating the lessons learned on the ELF X.

The result was the ELFe (for endurance) that debuted at the 1981 Bol d’Or and, with substantial ELF backing, competed in every round of the World Endurance Championship until the end of 1983. Though the ELFe was very fast, often qualifying on pole and leading early laps, the chassis was unreliable. Refined to the purest form of de Cortanze’s ideas, it finished third in the final 1000cc TTl/Endurance race at Mugello in 1983, then captured six world-speed records at Italy’s Nardo test track in 1986 in ELF R (for record) form, fitted with special streamlining.

The end of one-liter endurance racing at the end of the 1983 season enabled ELF to enter the higher-profile world of prototype GP racing and reap better promotional dividends. Honda supported them with three-cylinder RS500 engines, and in June of 1984 the ELF2 began testing in the hands of de Cortanze’s longtime collaborator, Christian Leliard. Its most interesting feature was a revolutionary steering system, consisting of handlebars mounted to a crossmember and rigged to move fore and aft, rather than pivoting side to side. The suspension was also adventurous, utilizing a pair of specially made Marzocchi shocks beneath the engine that worked in traction rather than in compression.

The Black Bird, as it was dubbed by the French press, never raced. Riders found the curious steering system hard to get used to (push-starting on a crowded GP grid would have been exciting!). The proximity of the suspension pivots and insufficient damping from the special Marzocchis led to incurable handling problems. It didn’t debut until a year later at the French GP at Le Mans, by which time it morphed into the less-quirky ELF2A, with proven ELFe-type hub-center steering and revised suspension.

At this point de Cortanze was forced to give up his involvement with the ELF project, which had been dwindling due to the pressure of his new job with Peugeot. Guiter entrusted the next stage of development to race manager Serge Rosset, who had been running a pair of NS500 Honda triples in ELF colors while waiting for the ELF2, and engineer/draftsman Dan Trema. Guiter and ELF management were hungry for results. With this in mind, Rosset and Trema collaborated on the relatively conventional ELF3, powered by works Honda NS500 engines. British rider Ron Haslam, fifth in the World Championship the previous year, would ride it.
Rosset’s commitment to produce results had immediate effect. Haslam used the ELF3 to score ELF’s first 500cc World Championship point in its first race at Jarama in 1986. Haslam was a superb test rider, forging an unlikely but lasting close relationship with Rosset. In the hands of this Anglo-French alliance the ELF3 progressed quickly, winding up ninth at the end of the season ahead of the works Suzuki team. The breakthrough had been made: Here was an alternative design that worked as well as a conventional one right out of the box, with an entire development cycle ahead.

Honda agreed, signing a secret 1985 agreement to evaluate ELF’s patented designs with an eye toward production applications. Commercial negotiations to lease the patents began, and an agreement was signed in September 1987. The first Honda to incorporate ELF’s patented single-sided rear swingarm (henceforth dubbed ‘Pro-Arm’) had already been introduced to the market. Trema holds the distinction of being the first outsider to spend a fortnight working inside HRC. He visited there late in 1986 to design parts for the new ELF4 and to work on the NSR500C V4 engine. Delays meant Haslam started the season riding a standard NSR Honda in ELF colors, but he finished fourth in the 1987 points table though he only rode the ELF4 in the final few GPs. Serious brake problems delayed the bike’s race debut. A proposed carbon-fiber chassis was rejected after laboratory tests showed its failure to meet minimum safety standards.

Instead, Rosset and Trema redesigned the V4 ELF for 1988. That was the final year of the ELF bike project, at least partially because of concept champion Guiter’s imminent retirement. Employing a cast-magnesium chassis and Honda-supplied Nissin front brakes, the ELF5 worked well enough, but the conventional opposition had become stronger and more sophisticated. Three seventh places and 11th in the points standings were the fruits of its disappointing final season; an anticlimactic end for a project that had promised so much and actually delivered such useful technology.

In the end, the ELF roadracing effort went out with a whimper instead of a glorious bang. But there was one race victory in the 1986 Macau GP, on a circuit where Ron Haslam is the acknowledged master, to point to as proof that the unconventional motorcycle really did work. Honda obviously thought so too. Every Pro-Arm-equipped VFR Interceptor that rolls out the door reminds us of this fortuitous collaboration. Who are we to argue that?




The final edition
Riding elf5,The End of This Innovative Line
The ELF5 that carried Ron Haslam to 11th place in the 1988 500cc World Championship (sevenths at Spa and Brno were his best results that season) was the ultimate expression of the project’s design philosophy. I had ridden most of the previous ELF designs and was keen to sample the last in line. I got my chance after the 1988 racing season at circuit Paul Ricard during the Au Revoir les ELF test day. The ELF5 evolved from the ELF3, with a true frameset and a single horizontal front swingarm using a MacPherson-like strut and single Showa suspension unit. Team Manager Serge Rosset called this sophisticated, highly adjustable front-end design the VGC System, for Variation Geometrique Controle, or controlled geometric variation. To reduce weight, most chassis and suspension components were made from cast magnesium. The 1988 ELF5 actually used the 1987 Honda NSR500 two-stroke engine, as the ’88 version wasn’t available early enough to allow development of the cast chassis.

The riding position was more extreme than a conventional NSR. You sat farther forward to get more weight on the front wheel. On track, the ELF5 pushed badly, sending me off the outside of the fast sweeper at the end of the Mistrale Straight and again at the tight left after the Pif-Paf chicane.

Haslam explained you couldn’t ride the ELF5 like a traditional GP racer, braking late and steering with the rear on the way out. The ELF5 needed lean angle to turn. When steered like a conventional GP bike, it felt heavy and unresponsive. But apex the corner in a classical Mike Hailwood style and steering became neutral, though still heavy. It was stable but far from nimble, unlike the lighter-feeling ELF3, which felt much more controllable.

What you got in exchange for heavy steering was unparalleled braking stability. Because of the hub-center design’s constant steering geometry, you could brake harder and later than on any conventional machine, and turn under braking without upsetting the handling. Another advantage of the ELF5 was exceptional chassis adjustability; all the usual suspension settings, plus head angle, wheelbase, trail, ride height front and rear, as well as weight distribution were all readily changeable.

It didn’t win a championship, but with the ELF5 Serge Rosset’s dream of une moto a la carte-a bike that could be easily altered to suit the taste of anyone-had been realized. As a believer in the ELF philosophy from the start, I still can’t help but feel a sense of unfinished business surrounding the concept. As former ELF rider Dave Aldana wrote in a sidebar to my test of the ELFe back in 1983: “Nice bike, but not done yet.”

I’ll go along with that.

Tracing A Decade Of Radical Racebike Experimentation
By Alan Cathcart
Enhanced by Zemanta

When two cylinders were not enough – 1911 Pierce Four





In 1911, few machines could leave an impression like the Pierce Four. After all, most other motorcycles of the time still showed their spindly bicycle roots, with skinny tube frames and diminutive, single-cylinder motors or, occasionally, twins.

Not the Pierce. With a massive frame and a beefy, four-cylinder engine, it commanded respect in the fledgling motorcycle world. It’s easy to imagine Pierce owners taking pride in motoring past lesser machines on the crude roads of the day.
Of course, it’s no surprise that Pierce came in at the prestige end of the motorcycling spectrum. After all, it traced its roots to the Pierce Great Arrow Motor Car Co., which made some of the most luxurious American cars available.
Spun off from the parent company in September 1906, the New York-based Pierce Cycle Company was started by Percy Pierce, the son of the original company’s president, George Pierce. And, true to the firm’s luxury roots, the motorcycle division wanted to start with an upscale product.
It’s likely Percy found his inspiration for this machine in Europe, specifically in motorcycles like the exclusive Belgian-built FN, says Geoffrey Stein, associate curator of history at the New York State Museum and author of “The Motorcycle Industry in New York State.” As the first mass-produced four-cylinder bike on the Continent, the FN had turned heads in Europe and America.
“The FNs had been sold in this country since 1906, so they were around,” Stein says. “It’s not as if Pierce had to come up with the idea for a four on their own.”

Still, Percy’s company brought some innovation to the four, introduced in 1909. The hollow frame held fuel in the copper-coated upper sections, and oil in the front downtube. The “vibrationless” engine put power to the road with shaft drive, and, beginning in 1910, had a two-speed transmission and multi-disc clutch. Other high-end touches included hidden control cables, and a spring/pneumatic front fork.
By the time the company built this 1911 model, however, trouble was brewing at Pierce. The death of George Pierce, a company bankruptcy, Percy’s resignation and eventual return rocked the company. At the same time, the public’s appetite for expensive motorcycles was rapidly dwindling.
By 1914, the Pierce motorcycle line was no more. 


Enhanced by Zemanta