5 Leadership quality- Dr.King

One morning in 1965, Robert Ellis Smith, then-recent Harvard University graduate, received a phone call that would change his life. On the other end was a former fellow student who was starting a newspaper in Montgomery, Ala., strictly dedicated to covering the Civil Rights Movement. The voice on the other line asked Ellis Smith, former president of The Harvard Crimson, to lead the project. Without hesitation, he took the job and headed down to the Deep South.

“There wasn’t a lot of newspaper coverage of small communities, so that is where we put our focus,” he says, adding that the newspaper was titled The Southern Courier. “We also wanted to produce a publication that would be read by both blacks and whites, which was a new concept at the time.”

For the next year, he covered the movement and often interviewed the legendary Martin Luther King, Jr. In addition to remembering his lively sense of humor, Ellis Smith recalls King’s superior leadership ability—evident in one particular exchange.

“Coming up on December 1965, the 10th anniversary of the Montgomery bus boycott, I called Dr. King to ask him to write a piece for our publication,” says Ellis Smith.

When King turned in the article a few days later, Ellis Smith was struck by references to Greek philosophers and became worried that the words would not resonate with King’s largely uneducated audience. Even so, Ellis Smith ran King’s piece on the front page and the next day’s paper was a big seller.

Today, Ellis Smith lives in Providence, RI, and is founder and publisher of Privacy Journal, a monthly newsletter focused on personal security. As a small business owner himself, he looks back on his time covering the South and gleans leadership lessons from King that he uses in his own business to this day.

Don’t underestimate low-level employees

Just as King didn’t hesitate to quote philosophers in his written pieces, great small business leaders should not underestimate even the lowest level employees in their organizations.

“I was worried about the references, but he assured me that wisdom is present in people even in the most humble circumstances,” remembers Ellis Smith. “He taught me never to underestimate anyone below me, that they have wisdom, life experience and are introspective.”

Embrace fear

King didn’t hide his fear. He was scared before every speech and worried that his points wouldn’t be well received or that he would be met with violent protests, says Ellis Smith. But instead of hiding, he talked about it and faced his fear head on.

“He used to tell me, ‘If you are not anxious, that means you are not engaged, that you shouldn’t fear fear, you should go with it,’” recalls Ellis Smith.

King’s willingness to embrace his fear is a great lesson for small business owners. As Ellis Smith says, entrepreneurs may fear competition and new technology in today’s business environment, but instead of shying away it is important to face these obstacles head on and not to be afraid of change.

Encourage ‘creative tension’

Every time King visited a new city to spread his message, community leaders would blame him for disturbing the norm. But to King, that was the point.

“He used to use the word ‘creative tension’ to explain that fairness and change come only when you shake things up,” says Ellis Smith.

Today’s small business owners can use this lesson within their own organizations by encouraging new ideas and internal criticism from employees, he notes.

Know the ‘why’

Over in Washington, D.C., Daron Pressley may not have known King personally, but as a small business owner, he looks to the Civil Rights icon as a beacon of inspiration in his company.

“I think Dr. King’s biggest leadership lesson that translates to my business is to make sure my team knows why we do what we do,” says Pressley, founder of The Premier Athlete, a student athlete development company. “It isn’t just to make a profit, it is knowing your purpose, cause and belief.”

Instead of giving an ‘I Have a Plan’ speech, King gave his famous ‘I Have a Dream’ speech, says Pressley. He recommends small business owners use this fact to talk to employees about what they believe, the real reason for starting their business and whom the business is helping. By doing this, entrepreneurs can inspire those around them, just like King did.

Involve everyone

King inspired community involvement in the Civil Rights Movement, and it worked partly because people wanted to be part of something bigger than themselves, notes Don Phillips, author of Martin Luther King, Jr., on Leadership: Inspiration and Wisdom for Challenging Times.

“In a small business, people really perform when they feel like they are part of something special,” he says. “King used to say ‘people derive inspiration from involvement,’ so the lesson is to get your people involved.”

Phillips says small business owners can utilize King’s words by involving all levels of the organization in company goal planning. You never know what great ideas will surface.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Black Out Of English-language Wikipedia for 24 hours -protesting SOPA/PIPA

To: 
English Wikipedia Readers and Community
Image representing Wikipedia as depicted in Cr...Image via CrunchBase





From: 
Sue Gardner
Executive Director
Wikimedia Foundation
Date: January 16, 2012


Today, the Wikipedia community announced its decision to black out the English-language Wikipedia for 24 hours, worldwide, beginning at 05:00 UTC on Wednesday, January 18 (you can read the statement from the Wikimedia Foundation here). The blackout is a protest against proposed legislation in the United States—theStop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives, and the PROTECTIP Act (PIPA) in the U.S. Senate—that, if passed, would seriously damage the free and open Internet, including Wikipedia.


This will be the first time the English Wikipedia has ever staged a public protest of this nature, and it’s a decision that wasn’t lightly made. Here’s how it’s been described by the three Wikipedia administrators who formally facilitated the community’s discussion. From the public statement, signed by User:NuclearWarfare, User:Risker and User:Billinghurst:It is the opinion of the English Wikipedia community that both of these bills, if passed, would be devastating to the free and open web.Over the course of the past 72 hours, over 1800 Wikipedians have joined together to discuss proposed actions that the community might wish to take against SOPA and PIPA. This is by far the largest level of participation in a community discussion ever seen on Wikipedia, which illustrates the level of concern that Wikipedians feel about this proposed legislation. The overwhelming majority of participants support community action to encourage greater public action in response to these two bills. Of the proposals considered by Wikipedians, those that would result in a “blackout” of the English Wikipedia, in concert with similar blackouts on other websites opposed to SOPA and PIPA, received the strongest support.On careful review of this discussion, the closing administrators note the broad-based support for action from Wikipedians around the world, not just from within the United States. The primary objection to a global blackout came from those who preferred that the blackout be limited to readers from the United States, with the rest of the world seeing a simple banner notice instead. We also noted that roughly 55% of those supporting a blackout preferred that it be a global one, with many pointing to concerns about similar legislation in other nations.


In making this decision, Wikipedians will be criticized for seeming to abandon neutrality to take a political position. That’s a real, legitimate issue. We want people to trust Wikipedia, not worry that it is trying to propagandize them.


But although Wikipedia’s articles are neutral, its existence is not. As Wikimedia Foundation board member Kat Walsh wrote on one of our mailing lists recently,We depend on a legal infrastructure that makes it possible for us to operate. And we depend on a legal infrastructure that also allows other sites to host user-contributed material, both information and expression. For the most part, Wikimedia projects are organizing and summarizing and collecting the world’s knowledge. We’re putting it in context, and showing people how to make to sense of it.But that knowledge has to be published somewhere for anyone to find and use it. Where it can be censored without due process, it hurts the speaker, the public, and Wikimedia. Where you can only speak if you have sufficient resources to fight legal challenges, or, if your views are pre-approved by someone who does, the same narrow set of ideas already popular will continue to be all anyone has meaningful access to.


The decision to shut down the English Wikipedia wasn’t made by me; it was made by editors, through a consensus decision-making process. But I support it.


Like Kat and the rest of the Wikimedia Foundation Board, I have increasingly begun to think of Wikipedia’s public voice, and the goodwill people have for Wikipedia, as a resource that wants to be used for the benefit of the public. Readers trust Wikipedia because they know that despite its faults, Wikipedia’s heart is in the right place. It’s not aiming to monetize their eyeballs or make them believe some particular thing, or sell them a product. Wikipedia has no hidden agenda: it just wants to be helpful.


That’s less true of other sites. Most are commercially motivated: their purpose is to make money. That doesn’t mean they don’t have a desire to make the world a better place—many do!—but it does mean that their positions and actions need to be understood in the context of conflicting interests.


My hope is that when Wikipedia shuts down on January 18, people will understand that we’re doing it for our readers. We support everyone’s right to freedom of thought and freedom of expression. We think everyone should have access to educational material on a wide range of subjects, even if they can’t pay for it. We believe in a free and open Internet where information can be shared without impediment. We believe that new proposed laws like SOPA—and PIPA, and other similar laws under discussion inside and outside the United States—don’t advance the interests of the general public. You can read a very good list of reasons to oppose SOPA and PIPA here, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.


Why is this a global action, rather than US-only? And why now, if some American legislators appear to be in tactical retreat on SOPA?


The reality is that we don’t think SOPA is going away, and PIPA is still quite active. Moreover, SOPA and PIPA are just indicators of a much broader problem. All around the world, we’re seeing the development of legislation seeking to regulate the Internet in other ways while hurting our online freedoms. Our concern extends beyond SOPA and PIPA: they are just part of the problem. We want the Internet to remain free and open, everywhere, for everyone.


Make your voice heard!





On January 18, we hope you’ll agree with us, and will do what you can to make your own voice heard.


Sue Gardner,
Executive Director, Wikimedia Foundation

Enhanced by Zemanta

An Italian Harley-Steve Bond

The name “Harley-Davidson” usually conjures images of large, V-twin, heavily-chromed motorcycles, but this Harley has only one cylinder, utilizes magnesium instead of “bling” and, even though its natural habitat is Daytona, you’ll find it at the racetrack, not trolling Main Street.

Aeronautica Macchi (soon abbreviated to Aermacchi) was founded by Julio Macchi in 1912 and originally manufactured seaplanes. The company stayed true to its airy roots until just after World War 2, when (for obvious reasons) it started producing three-wheeled delivery vehicles. Their first motorcycle hit the Italian market in 1950 and the company became so successful that Harley-Davidson bought 50 percent of Aermacchi in 1960.

Why? At that time, the “you meet the nicest people on a Honda” lightweight motorcycle boom was in full swing in North America and Harley, with nothing smaller than their 883 Sportster available, wanted in. So they re-badged Aermacchi 250 and 350 cc horizontal single-cylinder machines in Italy and sold them as Harley Sprints.

As recreational motorcycling grew, so did various forms of racing. So it was natural that Sprints were transformed into racers. Some were pressed into dirt track duty while others competed in the pavement wars – quite successfully. With 35 horsepower on tap and a dry weight of only 215 lb, the motorcycle had a great power to weight ratio and the chassis was Italian thoroughbred so you can bet the handling was top-drawer. In fact, Dick Hammer won the Expert 100-mile 250 race at Daytona on a CRTT and as late as 1968, Don Hollingsworth won the 76-mile Novice race at Daytona on an Aermacchi 250 – beating a horde of TD1 Yamaha two-strokes in the process.


The motorcycle gracing these pages is a 1964 Harley/Aermacchi 250 cc CRTT – purpose built from the factory for road racing – not a modified street bike.

The frame is a massive single backbone with the engine hung below and is further reinforced with judicious bracing, most noticeably the one connecting the upper shock mount to the swingarm pivot. Harley got their fingers in with noticeably oversize street handgrips and the somewhat clunky folding footpegs, all proudly sporting the Harley Davidson logo.

The engine is the full-race undersquare “longstroke” motor with bore and stroke being 66 x 72mm. The 30 mm Del Orto carburetor is mounted vertically so the fuel mixture gets a straight shot into the intake port of the horizontal cylinder, but to prevent extreme flooding, the carb has a rubber-mounted remote float bowl. Confirming the pedigree, both cylinder and head are aluminum but go one step further by being sandcast. Nice.

Both brakes have magnesium hubs, the front drum being a twin-shoe model with racing linings, and wheels are gorgeous aluminum alloy units. Racing touches abound on the motorcycle, as brake stays, activating arms, and even the friction steering damper knob are drilled for lightness. The CRTT is set off beautifully by the streamlined aluminum fuel tank.

Bar Hodgson purchased this CRTT from Paul Trethewey, a collector and enthusiast of Italian exotics. The original owner had raced this bike out of Florida where the bike saw a lot of action in the Southeast USA. When Paul began the restoration he found the original racer had rebuilt the brakes and wheels after campaigning. Paul shipped the crankshaft to England for rebuilding and balancing and then commissioned noted Aermacchi builder, Joe Lachniet, in Michigan to complete the engine rebuild. After dealing with the painting, chroming and suede seat recovering Paul had Rick Covello complete the re-assembly. The restoration is complete although Bar is currently tidying up a few items and trying to locate an original Smiths tachometer.

Some Aermacchi race bikes (and street bikes) were given the name Ala D’Oro. Honda actually had to pay Aermacchi for the rights to use this name when they introduced a revolutionary touring bike in 1975 – the Gold Wing.

This Harley isn’t an overweight poser in a Hawaiian sport shirt – it’s a genuine tri-athlete with an Armani suit.

Enhanced by Zemanta

1917 Indian Model O



Talk about a coincidence.


What are the odds that two motorcycle manufacturers, locked in competition for domination of the U.S. market, would come out with the 
same radically
 different design at nearly the same time?

That’s exactly what happened to Indian and Harley-Davidson more than 80 years ago. And the fact that the motorcycles in question were abysmal sales failures only adds to the mystery.
The blind alley into which both companies sped full-throttle? The market for low-horsepower, horizontally opposed twin-cylinder motorcycles.
Indian that charged into the fray first, when it introduced the Model O Light Twin in 1917. In a bold move away from the singles and V-twins that had powered the first 16 years of the company’s success, Indian brought out a 15.7-cubic-inch (265cc) horizontally opposed twin-cylinder motor mounted in a lightweight frame.
This is the engine design that would become famous in generations of BMW motorcycles, continuing to this day. But the design can trace its roots back to British-made Douglas motorcycles, which had been in production since 1907.
Like the early Douglases, the Model O had its engine placed in the frame with the cylinders facing fore and aft, rather than sticking out to each side, the way BMW would eventually do it. It made for a motorcycle that was narrow, lightweight, smooth and practical—all characteristics that Indian hoped would attract a new crop of younger customers.
As it turned out, the Model O was exactly what motorcyclists didn’t want. Its small motor didn’t excite enthusiasts, and the dropping prices of mass-produced cars effectively destroyed the market for motorcycles as cheap transportation.
To add insult to injury, the Model O quickly became known as the “Model Nothing.’’
Sales weren’t great to start with, and they weren’t helped when America got involved in World War I in 1917. Military production meant fewer civilian models for the duration of the war, and the Model O was dropped after 1919.
You’d think that after watching the Light Twin fail, Harley would have learned from Indian’s mistake. But just as the O disappeared, Harley’s Sport Twin—with a motor that looks startlingly similar—debuted in 1919. It, too, never really caught on and was dropped by 1923.







Via : Motorcycle Museum

Enhanced by Zemanta

RiderScan – Bikers life saver

RiderScan offers motorcycle/scooter riders total blind spot visibility for the first time.
Unique design with three vertical planes that gives a fantastic view, including the rider.
Continuous horizontal curve gives the rider a fantastic 180 degrees horizontal view into the blind spot areas.
Ultra lightweight and easy to fit to 99% of motorcycle/scooter screens.
Handlebar mounting brackets are available for 7/8“ and 1“ handlebars also headlamp bracket mountings.

RiderScan is available to order online. Contact us if you have any questions.

£36 is an introductory price.

HOW RIDERSCAN WORKS

RiderScan is a parabolic mirror that is mounted to the centre front of a motorcycle/scooter within the riders forward line of view.

RiderScan because of its fitting location within the riders forward line of view and just above or below the clocks this makes it much more obvious to the rider when something enters the blind spot areas verses side mounted wide angle mirrors.

RiderScan’s continues horizontal curve gives the rider 180 degrees horizontal coverage and the three designed vertical curves give a fantastic view keeping the road, the traffic and the rider in the picture even when the bike is leaning into a bend. Because you see yourself in the whole picture means we can truly say “RiderScan truly adds another dimension to the riding experience“.

HOW TO USE RIDERSCAN

RiderScan is a scanning mirror, when mounted correctly under normal circumstances the rider at one glance will see into all the blindspot areas.

RiderScan is a scanning mirror and not to be used without a final shoulder check. When a potential hazard is noticed in the RiderScan the rider should look to the hazard to get the true perspective. One quick glance into your RiderScan will let you know what is around you on both sides.

Whilst riding do not stare at yourself in your RiderScan no matter how good looking you are 😉 RiderScan has guide marks on the top to indicate the direction of the reflected image, use this until you know your RiderScan Always remember your arms, your jacket thickness and poor positioning of your RiderScan can affect its use as a blind spot mirror and its ability to warn you of potential hazards.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Next GENERATION CAFE RACER –

Mo2or cafe racer bike is a concept design study of what our next generation cafe racer should look like according to the respect of dream specification.

This cafe racer design is actually based on the classic theme but at the same time modern in term of human sitting position and some essence of today’s visual appeal.
This bike uses the 800cc v-twin engine with totally new and different design approach. It’s a perfect blend of classic look with hi-tech technology.


Designer : Rahul Rathore

Mo2or Cafe Racer Design Proposal by Rahul Rathore
Mo2or Cafe Racer Design Proposal by Rahul Rathore

Mo2or Cafe Racer Design Proposal by Rahul Rathore
Click the image above for bigger view
Mo2or Cafe Racer Design Proposal by Rahul Rathore
Mo2or Cafe Racer Design Proposal by Rahul Rathore
To get featured pls Submit A Design‘ feature, where we welcome our readers to 
submit,their-design/concept 
Enhanced by Zemanta

EMAIL YOUR FRIENDS

Make an even greater impact by copying the message below and sending to your friends and family.

Subject: Make Aid Transparent

Dear Friends

Overseas aid makes a real difference. It can save lives, put children into school, and reduce extreme poverty. But at the moment we don’t have a full picture of how much money is being spent, where, or on what. With more information, citizens would be able to see where and how aid is spent, putting them in a better position to demand that it is spent effectively.

Join me in calling on governments to make aid transparent:

http://act.one.org/sign/make_aid_transparent?referring_akid=2737.1874749.uPISMb&source=taf

Providing more and better information about aid isn’t hard, and it will help save lives, reduce corruption and waste, and deliver lasting positive change in the world’s poorest countries.

Take action right now at:

http://act.one.org/sign/make_aid_transparent?referring_akid=2737.1874749.uPISMb&source=taf

Thank you, 

Melwin Daniel

Enhanced by Zemanta