Royal Enfield Factory – 57 years of Heritage

Royal Enfield, a 119-year-old Anglo-Indian motorcycle maker with a cult following, has brought its distinctive bikes into the modern era with new and quieter engines.

Royal Enfield  Factory

Workers assemble a Royal Enfield motorcycle inside its factory in Chennai. The 119-year-old Anglo-Indian motorcycle maker with a cult following, has brought its distinctive bikes into the modern era with new and quieter engines but can’t make them fast enough to meet demand.

Royal Enfield  Factory

2.The once-sleepy company sold 74,600 motorcycles in 2011, a 40 percent increase, all made at its 57-year-old factory in Chennai, and is spending $30 million this fiscal year in a push to double capacity and upgrade manufacturing technology.

Royal Enfield  Factory

3.      A new engine has replaced Royal Enfield’s antiquated cast iron engine, boosting acceleration, performance, mileage and reliability, and reducing emissions.

Royal Enfield  Factory



4.      The company is best known for the powerful Bullet model, but it is the newer Classic series that is driving growth in a crowded and fast-expanding Indian market where 10 million motorbikes were sold last year.


5.      Royal Enfield originally built motorcycles to be parachuted into enemy territory by British forces during the Second World War, and the classic styling and trademark thumping of its engine at full throttle drew a legion of gearheads to the brand, including television host and motor enthusiast Jay Leno.

Royal Enfield  Factory



SOURCE

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Shankar Ganesh GP
Date: Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:55 PM
Subject: Inside Royal Enfield’s 57-year-old factory in Chennai

Related articles

Timing Cover can do just more than being a cover

This is a clock I made a while back from a Classic 70’s Norton Commando engine side cover .


Step 1Find a Classic 70’s Motorcycle side cover

I still  own, and  ride,  my two Classic British motorcycles, a restored 1967 Triumph Trophy 650, and a 1972 Norton Commando Interstate 750. I loved them back in the 60’s and promised myself I would someday ride and own at least one. Well I did just that.
I would go to swop  meets and buy spares parts. One day I found some engine side covers for cheap. So I cleaned them up and found a clock that almost fit the timing point socket on the right side.


Step 2Get a clock that fits in the timing point hole

I was lucky to find a small battery clock that almost fit in the timing point hole. All I needed was to fill the space around the clock so it was snug. Leatherwork is one of my hobbies, so I cut out a ring of black leather to fit. 


Step 3Make a bracket to hang it

I made a bracket of flat aluminum stock to hang it. I drilled some holes in the middle to attach it to a wall hook.


Step 4Put some nice stainless bolts on the outside

I wanted some nice border bolts to glitz it up. I found some nice staainless steel hex head ones at Homeydepo. Put the gasket around the clock, put in a fresh AAA battery, place it in the hole, hang it and enjoy!


Step 5I made one from a Triumph too!

Since I love 60’s Triumphs too I also made one of those. I’m recycling metal and making art too. Wow, who would have guessed? Enjoy, time waits for no man (or woman)!

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Molnari Gyrocycle – Tired of Traffic ? fly for a change

For updates and interesting articles and pictures , follow us on ……………………………..







Is a combination motorcycle and helicopter currently under development by Dezso Molnar and his team. The initial prototype, the Molnari GT, first flew in 2006. 

Molnari GT flight tests in 2006. 50 Horsepower single-cylinder engine; 650cc. Flew on the first attempt. 30+ flights were made. No crashes or damage. Aircraft now resides in the Florida Air Museum. Street legal road performance is ~ 100 MPH and 50 miles per gallon.

The second 

prototype, the GT2, has been street tested and is now being prepared for flight operations. The GT2 was on display at last weekend’s Maker Faire.

Abstract
A vehicle that can operate as either a motorcycle or an autogiro, said vehicle having a flight mode and a motorcycle mode, said vehicle comprising: a frame having a front part and a rear part; a center-line that passes from the front of said vehicle to the rear of said vehicle through the center of said vehicle such that said vehicle’s weight is distributed nearly equally to either side of said center-line; a propeller mounted to a propeller barrel that is rotatably mounted to said frame such that the junction where said frame’s front part meets said frame’s rear part is located within said propeller barrel; an engine mounted to the rear part of said frame, wherein said engine powers said propeller in said flight mode; a cockpit fixedly mounted to the front part of said frame, said cockpit comprising means for controlling said vehicle; at least one aircraft lift means comprising: at least one rotor that is rotatably mounted to said frame when said vehicle is in said flight mode; a front wheel steerably and rotatably mounted to the front part of said frame along the said vehicle’s center-line; and a rear wheel that is rotatably mounted to the rear part of said frame along said vehicle’s center-line and is powered by said engine in said motorcycle mode.







Claims




What is claimed is:

1. A vehicle that can operate as either a motorcycle or an autogiro, said vehicle having a flight mode and a motorcycle mode, said vehicle comprising: a frame having a front part and a rear part; a center-line that passes from the front of said vehicle to the rear of said vehicle through the center of said vehicle such that said vehicle’s weight is distributed nearly equally to either side of said center-line; at least one propeller mounted to a propeller barrel that is rotatably mounted to said vehicle’s frame at the junction where said frame’s front part fixedly connects to said frame’s rear part; an engine mounted to the rear part of said frame, wherein said engine powers said propeller in said flight mode; a cockpit fixedly mounted to the front part of said frame, said cockpit comprising means for controlling said vehicle; at least one aircraft lift means comprising: at least one rotor that is rotatably mounted to said frame when said vehicle is in said flight mode; a front wheel steerably and rotatably mounted to the front part of said frame along the said vehicle’s center-line; and a rear wheel that is is rotatably mounted to the rear part of said frame along said vehicle’s center-line and is powered by said engine in said motorcycle mode. 

2. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said vehicle has side wheels retractably and rotatably mounted to said frame and said side wheels act as landing gear in said flight mode and prevent said vehicle from tipping over at low speeds in said motorcycle mode. 

3. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein: said cockpit is enclosed in a monocoque shell that is attached to or incorporates the front part of said frame and said engine is enclosed in a monocoque shell that is attached to or incorporates the rear part of said frame. 

4. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said vehicle is also a water craft having a water mode and a means of aquatic propulsion and one or more flotation means attached to said frame. 

5. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said rotor comprises removable rotor blades that are stowable along the sides of said vehicle when said vehicle is not in said flight mode. 

6. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said rotor comprises foldable rotor blades that are folded when said vehicle is not in said flight mode. 

7. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said rotor comprises extendable rotor blades that are retracted when said vehicle is not in said flight mode. 

8. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said propeller comprises foldable propeller blades that are folded when said vehicle is not in said flight mode. 

9. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said engine powers said rotor to provide for shortened or vertical takeoff. 

10. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein an external power source connects to an external coupling mounted to said rotor and powers said rotor to provide for shortened or vertical takeoff. 

11. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein at least one rudder and at least one horizontal stabilizer are affixed to the rear part of said frame. 

12. The vehicle as in claim 1; wherein said engine is adjustably mounted to the rear part of said frame so that said engine can be raised and lowered vertically relative to the rear part of said frame, thereby switching the supply of mechanical power back and forth from said propeller to said rear wheel by slackening and loosing one or more drive belts or meshing and unmeshing gears.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Black Out Of English-language Wikipedia for 24 hours -protesting SOPA/PIPA

To: 
English Wikipedia Readers and Community
Image representing Wikipedia as depicted in Cr...Image via CrunchBase





From: 
Sue Gardner
Executive Director
Wikimedia Foundation
Date: January 16, 2012


Today, the Wikipedia community announced its decision to black out the English-language Wikipedia for 24 hours, worldwide, beginning at 05:00 UTC on Wednesday, January 18 (you can read the statement from the Wikimedia Foundation here). The blackout is a protest against proposed legislation in the United States—theStop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives, and the PROTECTIP Act (PIPA) in the U.S. Senate—that, if passed, would seriously damage the free and open Internet, including Wikipedia.


This will be the first time the English Wikipedia has ever staged a public protest of this nature, and it’s a decision that wasn’t lightly made. Here’s how it’s been described by the three Wikipedia administrators who formally facilitated the community’s discussion. From the public statement, signed by User:NuclearWarfare, User:Risker and User:Billinghurst:It is the opinion of the English Wikipedia community that both of these bills, if passed, would be devastating to the free and open web.Over the course of the past 72 hours, over 1800 Wikipedians have joined together to discuss proposed actions that the community might wish to take against SOPA and PIPA. This is by far the largest level of participation in a community discussion ever seen on Wikipedia, which illustrates the level of concern that Wikipedians feel about this proposed legislation. The overwhelming majority of participants support community action to encourage greater public action in response to these two bills. Of the proposals considered by Wikipedians, those that would result in a “blackout” of the English Wikipedia, in concert with similar blackouts on other websites opposed to SOPA and PIPA, received the strongest support.On careful review of this discussion, the closing administrators note the broad-based support for action from Wikipedians around the world, not just from within the United States. The primary objection to a global blackout came from those who preferred that the blackout be limited to readers from the United States, with the rest of the world seeing a simple banner notice instead. We also noted that roughly 55% of those supporting a blackout preferred that it be a global one, with many pointing to concerns about similar legislation in other nations.


In making this decision, Wikipedians will be criticized for seeming to abandon neutrality to take a political position. That’s a real, legitimate issue. We want people to trust Wikipedia, not worry that it is trying to propagandize them.


But although Wikipedia’s articles are neutral, its existence is not. As Wikimedia Foundation board member Kat Walsh wrote on one of our mailing lists recently,We depend on a legal infrastructure that makes it possible for us to operate. And we depend on a legal infrastructure that also allows other sites to host user-contributed material, both information and expression. For the most part, Wikimedia projects are organizing and summarizing and collecting the world’s knowledge. We’re putting it in context, and showing people how to make to sense of it.But that knowledge has to be published somewhere for anyone to find and use it. Where it can be censored without due process, it hurts the speaker, the public, and Wikimedia. Where you can only speak if you have sufficient resources to fight legal challenges, or, if your views are pre-approved by someone who does, the same narrow set of ideas already popular will continue to be all anyone has meaningful access to.


The decision to shut down the English Wikipedia wasn’t made by me; it was made by editors, through a consensus decision-making process. But I support it.


Like Kat and the rest of the Wikimedia Foundation Board, I have increasingly begun to think of Wikipedia’s public voice, and the goodwill people have for Wikipedia, as a resource that wants to be used for the benefit of the public. Readers trust Wikipedia because they know that despite its faults, Wikipedia’s heart is in the right place. It’s not aiming to monetize their eyeballs or make them believe some particular thing, or sell them a product. Wikipedia has no hidden agenda: it just wants to be helpful.


That’s less true of other sites. Most are commercially motivated: their purpose is to make money. That doesn’t mean they don’t have a desire to make the world a better place—many do!—but it does mean that their positions and actions need to be understood in the context of conflicting interests.


My hope is that when Wikipedia shuts down on January 18, people will understand that we’re doing it for our readers. We support everyone’s right to freedom of thought and freedom of expression. We think everyone should have access to educational material on a wide range of subjects, even if they can’t pay for it. We believe in a free and open Internet where information can be shared without impediment. We believe that new proposed laws like SOPA—and PIPA, and other similar laws under discussion inside and outside the United States—don’t advance the interests of the general public. You can read a very good list of reasons to oppose SOPA and PIPA here, from the Electronic Frontier Foundation.


Why is this a global action, rather than US-only? And why now, if some American legislators appear to be in tactical retreat on SOPA?


The reality is that we don’t think SOPA is going away, and PIPA is still quite active. Moreover, SOPA and PIPA are just indicators of a much broader problem. All around the world, we’re seeing the development of legislation seeking to regulate the Internet in other ways while hurting our online freedoms. Our concern extends beyond SOPA and PIPA: they are just part of the problem. We want the Internet to remain free and open, everywhere, for everyone.


Make your voice heard!





On January 18, we hope you’ll agree with us, and will do what you can to make your own voice heard.


Sue Gardner,
Executive Director, Wikimedia Foundation

Enhanced by Zemanta

Panther – Beauty which happens to be a Beast



History


Panther motorcycles were manufactured by Phelon & Moore (P&M) in Cleckheaton, Yorkshire, UK from 1900 to 1967. The most famous models are large (~600cc) single cylinder machines where the engine is a stressed member of the motorcycle frame (an idea patented in 1900 by Joah Phelon and Harry Rayner). P&M were noted for innovation in the first half of the century; as well as the first use of the engine as a stressed frame member, they were first to standardise on chain drive and introduce a two speed gear with chain drive as standard (1904). Even post-WW2 P&M were not shy of innovation; making early use of air sprung front suspension. They used the slogan “The Perfected Motorcycle”, leaving little room for improvement! In the 1950s Panthers were regarded highly but by the mid 1960s they were outdated when compared to Japanese machines and P&M went the way of most of the UK motorcycle industry. P&M were absorbed into the IMI group which retains an engineering facility in Cleckheaton, close to the original works.
The Bikes: Heavyweights

The Models{On 30/04/00 I broke up the unweildy single page on heavyweights into this collection of smaller pages on each stage of the development of the marque. There will doubtless be some teething problems – I anticipate many broken links between models – please aleert me to any you find. The boundaries between the various stages are somewhat arbitrary – especially between the P&M “Panther” models and the subsequent models of the Panther marque. I’ll do this a little more rigorously as the site develops. It’s a little untidy at this stage – bear with me!}

The first Panthers were the 1.75 h.p. Phelon & Rayner machines produced from 1901 to 1903.

The design was licensed to Humber who produced 2.75 h.p. and 4.5 h.p. machines from 1903 to 1905.

After disputes with Humber over licenses and royalties Phelon & Moore started producing a range of P&M machines from 1904 through to 1925. These included 2.75 h.p., 3.5 h.p. (solo, sidecar and forecar), 4.5 h.p. and the 3.5 h.p. Colonial and RFC/RAF models.

From 1924 through to 1935 P&M produced various models with the name Panther. The models that I am (somewhat arbitrarily) considering to be P&M Panthers are the 1924-29 Panther (including Models 1 to 3), 1930-35 Panther 50 and Panther 55, 1932 Panther 70 Express, 1929-35 Model 60 and 1929-35 Model 80 and 85.

From 1925 through to 1929 P&M produced various racing models.

From about 1929 the marque became known as Panther. The various Panther models post 1930 are treated separately.

From 1931 to 1938 a 490cc Model 90 was made.

From 1938 to 1939 the Model 95 (a vertical engined version of the 1938 Model 100) was made. This is a rare machine.

The definitive Panther is the Model 100, manufactured from 1932 through to 1963.

The final Panther heavyweight model is the Model 120, developed from the Model 100 in 1959 and sold through to the demise of P&M in 1966.
The Engine

The defining feature of the heavyweight Panthers is their engine. The design of motorcycle with a large single cylinder engine as a stressed member spanned the entire history of the company, starting with a 500cc model and ending with a 600cc model (Model 100) and a 650cc model (Model 120). This is a black and white line drawing of the classic large single engine. The cutaway drawing shows clearly details of the valve gear and the timing side. The Burman gearbox and Amal carb are also shown. My guess is that this is a mid fifties Model 100 engine (well I used this picture when I was building the engine in my mid fifties Model 100 – so it had better be!). The Amal Concentric rather than Monobloc carb would provide a latest date (which I will look up sometime real soon!). The engine is a stressed member in the frame and the brackets on the head where this attaches below the frame headstock are clearly visible. The engine has a semi wet sump as can be seen from close inspection of this picture. The prominent finned part of the crankcases at the lower front forms an oil tank as part of the engine. The flywheels do not run in this oil however; there is a weir separating them from this oil reservoir. Oil return is provided by the flywheels flinging oil over this weir. The oil pump is located behind the large pinion in the timing chest. The magneto (Lucas K1F) and dynamo (Lucas E3H ?) are mounted one above the other on top of the crankcases behind the cylinder. The magneto (the lower of the two) has manual advance/retard. There is a chain drive to the dynamo. Behind the lower pinion in the timing chest are the cams and the cam followers, tappets and push rods are visible.
The Bikes: 4-Stroke Lightweights

From the mid 1920s Phelon & Moore also produced a number of lightweights.

The PanthetteThe first of the lightweights was the Panthette, designed by Granville Bradshaw, this was a 250cc transverse V-twin of unit construction. It received very good road test reports and was genuinely liked by test riders. It lacked a heavy flywheel and had poor clutch plate control. It was a very “revvy” engine. Whilst of innovative design, it was a commercial disaster; its failure to sell well, at the time that The Depression was starting to bite, nearly bankrupt the company. Frank Leach effectively killed off the Panthette in favour of his own lightweight 250cc which later sold as the Red Panther. Very few Panthettes survive.

Four Stroke Single Panther Lightweights From the 1930s a range of two and four stroke lightwieghts were produced. The four-strokes were mainly 350cc and 250cc singles, the latter being somewhat underpowered. They were of conventional frame design, although some models (Model 60 and 70) had sloping engines, but not as stressed members.

Pre-war 250s included Model 30 (1932), Model 40, Model 70 Redwing, Red Panther Standard, Red Panther Model 20 Deluxe, Red Panther Model 20. Post-war 250s included Model 60 and Model 65.

Pre-war 350s included Model 45 (1932), Model 80 Redwing, Redwing 85, Red Panther Model 30. Post-war 350s included Model 70 and Model 75.

Model 30 & Model 40 & Model 70 RedwingLaunched in 1932 as the Model 30 and soon renamed the Model 40, this was a fairly conventional 248cc machine with clear links to the Heavyweight design. A DeLuxe model was available.

At some stage (1934?) it appears to have become the Model 70 Redwing, which according to The Book was dropped in 1936 and a 250cc Model 40 was again available in 1939 (combining Model 20 and Model 85)!

Budget versions were made for Pride & Clarke as Red Panthers (Standard, DeLuxe and Model 20).

Model 45 & Model 80 RedwingA 348cc version of the Model 40 was also launched in 1932 as the Model 45 and was renamed the Model 80 Redwing in 1933.

Budget versions were made for Pride & Clarke as Red Panther Model 30.

Red Panthers Red Panthers were built exclusively for Pride & Clarke of London at very low cost by using cheap labour (apprentices, mill hands, etc.) and cheaper ancilliary components (gearbox, ignition, lighting, etc.). The frame, mundguards, tank, etc produced by P&M were of the same standard as the Redwing models. There were 250cc and 350cc models. Surviving examples tend to have had a tough life; as budget machines they were often mistreated.

This is a Red Panther from 1932 to 1939, it is either 248cc or 348cc. I suspect it is a 248cc Red Panther DeLuxe from 1934. If a 250 then this model was the budget version of the Model 40 (Model 30 in 1930-32, later the Model 70). If a 350 then this would be a Red Panther Model 30 which was the budget version of the Panther Model 80 (Model 45 in 1932).

{The lightweight models, and especially the Red Panthers, are particularly confusing! Treat this information as indicative only – the revised model and year guide, currently under construction, will force me to get to grips with this properly and treat it with more rigour.}
Red Panther Standard / DeLuxe

248cc machine made in 1933-37 (DeLuxe offered at least 1934-35). This was the Pride & Clarke budget version of the Model 40 (Model 30 in 1932, later the Model 70). I believe these were Model 20s, except in 1933 when they were Model 10s.
This is Tom Norman’s 1937 Model 20 Red Panther.
Red Panther Model 20

248cc machine made in 1938 and 1939, incorporating improvements similar to those made in the Model 100 in 1938
Red Panther Model 30

The Red Panther Model 30 was a 348cc 15 bhp machine made from 1933 to 1939. It was the Pride & Clarke budget version of the Panther Model 80. From 1938/9? incorporating improvements similar to those made in the Model 100 in 1938
Model 60

The Model 60 was ready for production in 1940 and some may well have been made then. However it was mainly produced for three years (1946-1948) and was based upon the earlier 1938 Model 40 (Model 70 Redwing, Red Panther Model 20 – I get confused!)

This is a 1946 Model 60 which has a 248cc OHV engine. Whilst the engine is sloping forward it does not take the place of the front frame down-tube as is the case with the heavyweights. The drive is through a separate 3-speed gearbox. The front suspension is provided by girder forks. Webb girder forks were fitted for 1946.

This is a 1947 Model 60. Clearly it is very similar except that the Webb girder forks were replaced with Dowty forks for 1947/48.

Technical Data

I am grateful to Malcolm Duckett for providing the picture of the 1946 machine and technical data (from the Panther Instruction Booklet) and to Robert Shaw for posting the picture of the 1947 machine to the email list.
Model 70

The Model 70 is a 348cc, 4-speed version of the Model 60 and is similar in most other respects. It also was only produced for three years (1946-1948) and was based upon the pre-war Model 30.

I believe that this rather non-standard trials machine is a Model 70 from about 1947/48 – it is clearly a lightweight with Dowty forks and apparently has the slightly sloping engine and a magneto. Dowty forks were fitted in 1947/48, whereas Webb girder forks were fitted in 1946.

I am grateful to Tom Norman for this photograph of Dave Thornber’s bike.
Model 65

The Model 65 is essentially identical to the Model 75. The differences being that this was a 250cc version and the ignition was by way of points and coil rather than a Lucas K1F magneto. I believe it features a 3-speed Burman gearbox where the Model 75 has a 4-speed gearbox. They are generally considered somewhat underpowered by comparison to the larger 350cc model.

Technical Data

Model 75
This machine is one of my Model 75s. It has a 1956 engine in an earlier rigid frame, but is essentially to the 1949 specification. The tank should be chrome with cream panels. The front suspension is from lightweight Dowty air-sprung, oil-damped forks. The later engine has a rather taller rocker cover (as well as not looking quite right to the perfectionist, it is impossible to remove with the engine in the frame – the correct later frame has a kink in it under the tank to facilitate rocker cover removal). Ignition comes from a Lucas K1F magneto.

This pretty lightweight is, I think, a Model 75 from the early fifties (1951/53?). It has a rigid rear and apparently Dowty forks. The more rounded cases of the post 1949/50 engine are apparent as is the magneto which indicates a Model 75. The brake light is presumably non-standard and the battery is apparently missing (from behind the carb). The colour scheme is presumably not original.

This 1954 advert for a Model 75 shows the spring frame version introduced the previous year. The telescopic forks are presumably the P&M items.

This machine is a 1955 Model 75 springer.

Gallery














Related articles

An Italian Harley-Steve Bond

The name “Harley-Davidson” usually conjures images of large, V-twin, heavily-chromed motorcycles, but this Harley has only one cylinder, utilizes magnesium instead of “bling” and, even though its natural habitat is Daytona, you’ll find it at the racetrack, not trolling Main Street.

Aeronautica Macchi (soon abbreviated to Aermacchi) was founded by Julio Macchi in 1912 and originally manufactured seaplanes. The company stayed true to its airy roots until just after World War 2, when (for obvious reasons) it started producing three-wheeled delivery vehicles. Their first motorcycle hit the Italian market in 1950 and the company became so successful that Harley-Davidson bought 50 percent of Aermacchi in 1960.

Why? At that time, the “you meet the nicest people on a Honda” lightweight motorcycle boom was in full swing in North America and Harley, with nothing smaller than their 883 Sportster available, wanted in. So they re-badged Aermacchi 250 and 350 cc horizontal single-cylinder machines in Italy and sold them as Harley Sprints.

As recreational motorcycling grew, so did various forms of racing. So it was natural that Sprints were transformed into racers. Some were pressed into dirt track duty while others competed in the pavement wars – quite successfully. With 35 horsepower on tap and a dry weight of only 215 lb, the motorcycle had a great power to weight ratio and the chassis was Italian thoroughbred so you can bet the handling was top-drawer. In fact, Dick Hammer won the Expert 100-mile 250 race at Daytona on a CRTT and as late as 1968, Don Hollingsworth won the 76-mile Novice race at Daytona on an Aermacchi 250 – beating a horde of TD1 Yamaha two-strokes in the process.


The motorcycle gracing these pages is a 1964 Harley/Aermacchi 250 cc CRTT – purpose built from the factory for road racing – not a modified street bike.

The frame is a massive single backbone with the engine hung below and is further reinforced with judicious bracing, most noticeably the one connecting the upper shock mount to the swingarm pivot. Harley got their fingers in with noticeably oversize street handgrips and the somewhat clunky folding footpegs, all proudly sporting the Harley Davidson logo.

The engine is the full-race undersquare “longstroke” motor with bore and stroke being 66 x 72mm. The 30 mm Del Orto carburetor is mounted vertically so the fuel mixture gets a straight shot into the intake port of the horizontal cylinder, but to prevent extreme flooding, the carb has a rubber-mounted remote float bowl. Confirming the pedigree, both cylinder and head are aluminum but go one step further by being sandcast. Nice.

Both brakes have magnesium hubs, the front drum being a twin-shoe model with racing linings, and wheels are gorgeous aluminum alloy units. Racing touches abound on the motorcycle, as brake stays, activating arms, and even the friction steering damper knob are drilled for lightness. The CRTT is set off beautifully by the streamlined aluminum fuel tank.

Bar Hodgson purchased this CRTT from Paul Trethewey, a collector and enthusiast of Italian exotics. The original owner had raced this bike out of Florida where the bike saw a lot of action in the Southeast USA. When Paul began the restoration he found the original racer had rebuilt the brakes and wheels after campaigning. Paul shipped the crankshaft to England for rebuilding and balancing and then commissioned noted Aermacchi builder, Joe Lachniet, in Michigan to complete the engine rebuild. After dealing with the painting, chroming and suede seat recovering Paul had Rick Covello complete the re-assembly. The restoration is complete although Bar is currently tidying up a few items and trying to locate an original Smiths tachometer.

Some Aermacchi race bikes (and street bikes) were given the name Ala D’Oro. Honda actually had to pay Aermacchi for the rights to use this name when they introduced a revolutionary touring bike in 1975 – the Gold Wing.

This Harley isn’t an overweight poser in a Hawaiian sport shirt – it’s a genuine tri-athlete with an Armani suit.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Motom motorcycle


Exhibition of vintage motorcycles (Motom)

THE HISTORY OF MOTOM


At the end of World War II engineer Baptist Falchetto, former designer of the Spear, in cooperation with the industrialists Frua De Angelis had the idea to build a lightweight moped robust and cost (almost a small motorcycle), good performance, high reliability but who remain within the limits of the classic 50 cc.

The first named Motom Motomic presented at the Geneva Motor Show in 1947 and whose name is an abbreviation for Atomic Moto.The Motom consisted of a frame, printed with X-shape, consisting of two halves combined, and the soap reservoir to be inserted between the two, just behind the headstock. The proven automotive experience Falchetto inspires him in the design of the engine, with four-stroke cycle developed with the engine Sola, also of the Spear.
But are the characteristics of the motor vehicle Motom making that all subsequent years of production.It was a 4 stroke engine, single cylinder, air-cooled power of good and exceptionally low fuel consumption. Motom salient features of the engine were reliability, low power consumption (75 km on a liter of gasoline) and good performance (top speed in third faster than 50 kilometers per hour, maximum slope exceeds 22%).

The engine motom suffered years of only marginal changes (such as lubrication of valves in the head) that were sufficient to significantly improve the performance, so that patterns of the 60 athletes exceeded the 75 km times while maintaining exceptionally low fuel consumption.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Triumph Speed Twin

The Speed Twin 5T is a motorcycle that was made by Triumph at their Coventry factory. Edward Turner, Triumph’s Chief Designer and Managing Director, launched the Triumph Speed Twin at the 1937 National Motorcycle Show. It was a 500 cc OHV vertical twin in a lightweight frame and the first truly successful British twin, setting the standard for many twins to follow. After World War II the Speed Twin was responsible for the survival of Triumph – and every major British marque offered a 500 cc twin designed on similar lines to the Speed Twin



History
Edward Turner’s Triumph twin was a major turning point for the British motorcycle industry, as although a 500 cc parallel twin of medium capacity was not revolutionary, the 5T Speed Twin model was lighter than many contemporary singles with significantly more power and torque. Early models were only available in ‘Amaranth red’ with hand painted gold pinstripes to set off the chrome. Initially the one piece iron cylinder was secured with six studs which led to weakness, so these were replaced by eight studs The two cylinders were fed by a single Amal Type 6 carburettor and many features such as the transmission and clutch were straight from the Triumph single.  Originally with girder forks, the sprung saddle was the only rear suspension as the Speed Twin had a rigid frame – also from the single cylinder production line.On the night of 14 November 1940 the majority of the city-centre of Coventry was destroyed by German bombs and the Triumph factory (which was working on an order of thousands of military specification 5T’s) was completely wiped out, and all of Triumph’s technical records, drawings and designs were destroyed

Development
After the war the recovery of Triumph at Meriden was largely due to the Speed Twin, which was developed in 1946 with telescopic forks and optional (sprung hub) rear suspension. The headlamp and instrument area was tidied up in 1949 with the Turner-designed nacelle, a feature retained until the end of the model line. In 1953, the Speed Twin caused controversy among traditional British riders as the generator and magneto were replaced with a Lucas alternator and battery/coil ignition system.

Further development led to the 1959 model 5TA with a unit engine and gearbox construction and styling changes including the unpopular ‘Bathtub’ fairing which became more and more abbreviated as the model developed before disappearing altogether for the last year of production in 1966.

The unit 500 engine continued development in the parallel Tiger 100 range ending with the Tiger Daytonamodels which ceased production in 1973.




Related articles

Enhanced by Zemanta

The True Legend

the TRIUMPH Tiger 80 English was a bike built by Triumph 1937.





In the second half of the year 30 Triumph decided to design and market a new range of lightweight single-cylinder vehicles marketed under the name of Tiger 70, 80 e 90(the model indicates the maximum speed) with displacement, respectively 250, 350 e 500 and c.


The excellent sales results of these models enables the company to bring its disastrous finances of (mined by the Great Depression of the 1930) and generate good profits in the years to follow and makes our Triumph one of the largest motorcycle companies in England.
The engine of the T80 was a single cylinder four-stroke with a displacement of 349 cc. and had a power of 20Cv a 5700 rpm. The change was 4 speed and the final chain drive.




With the outbreak of World War II was set up as a model for military use named 3HW until, on the night of 14 November 1940, German bombers destroyed all the work of the Triumph and then ending the production of the Tiger.
After the rebuilding was put into production only the model 100, while the others were finally abandoned.

Enhanced by Zemanta